Legal Opinion

State Board of Equalization v. Bimetallic Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 2, 1914No. 8208PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. George W. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

delivered tlie opinion of the court:

By order of the trial court, plaintiffs in error, and Clair J. Pitcher, as county assessor, were enjoined, at the suit of defendants in error, from taking any steps *513whatever to enforce or carry ont any order, resolution, direction or action of the state board of equalization or the Colorado tax commission whereby the assessed valuations of the property of defendants in error, and others in like situation, were increased for the purpose of taxation for the year 1913 over and above the assessed valuations placed thereon by the county assessor for said year.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Colorado Tax Commission v. PitcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  2. Blomquist v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. PitcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  2. People Ex Rel. State Board of Equalization v. HivelySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Courtright Publishing Co. v. BraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Idaho State Tax Commission v. StakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Idaho State Tax Commission v. StakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API