Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided February 3, 2000No. 14-98-00451-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHARLES F. BAIRD, Justice (Assigned).

Appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of aggravated robbery. The indictment also alleged a prior felony conviction for the purpose of enhancing the range of punishment. Following appellant’s plea of not guilty, a jury convicted appellant of the charged offense. Appellant then pled true to the enhancement allegation and the jury assessed punishment at seventy-five years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. The First Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction but reversed and remanded the case…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  2. Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
  3. Armando Mungia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  4. Ex Parte Jesse Dale Fox, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. Gerardo Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API