Legal Opinion
Gill v. Stolow
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 13, 1955PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge.
On September 1, 1955, I filed an opinion granting plaintiff’s motion to strike the answer of defendant partnership and enter default judgment against it pursuant to Rule 37(d), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., for the failure of co-partner Harry Stolow to appear for the taking of his deposition on July 27, 1955. Defendant now moves for reargument of the motion for default judgment and for an order setting aside the default. After consideration of the affidavits and memoranda submitted on re-argument, I am of the opinion that there has been no reason shown why I should…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Robert J. Gill v. Julius Stolow and Harry Stolow, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of J. & H. StolowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- John R. Henry, Jr. v. Amalie Sneiders, and Amalie Sneiders, as Personal Representative of the Estateof Maksis Sneiders, Deceased, Defedant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Firestone v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hill v. VetterAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Two Old Hippies, LLC v. Catch the Bus, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.