Legal Opinion
City of West St. Paul v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 29, 1991No. CX-90-1349PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
The City of West St. Paul appeals from an entry of summary judgment against it on the ground that the implementation of its ride-along policy 1 is subject to mandatory bargaining. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant City of West St. Paul (City) is a public employer under the Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA). Minn. Stat. § 179A.03, subd. 15 (1988). Respondent Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS) is the certified exclusive bargaining representative for police officers employed by City.
LELS and City negotiated a labor contract for City’s police officers. They resolved all…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- City of Detroit v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Tapemark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 320 v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of West St. Paul v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992