Legal Opinion

In Interest of ADR

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 14, 1974No. 56658, 57596PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, Judge.

We have here two appeals consolidated for purposes of decision. Jurisdiction of both appeals was vested in this Court when the appeals were taken, and under the schedule to the amended Art. V, Mo.Const. adopted in 1970, effective January 1, 1972, V.A.M.S., we retain both appeals for decision.

An opinion herein was adopted in Division One, but by reason of a dissent thereto, the case was transferred to the Court En Banc. After reargument, the divisional opinion was not adopted and the case was reassigned for preparation of a new opinion. In the writing thereof, portions of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walter L. Harling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  2. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. State v. GullingsOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. LoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. State v. SindersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. PrudeIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. BenoitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. In Interest of ADRSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State v. MannsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API