State v. Bryan

¶1 Joshua Bryan challenges his sentence for two counts of residential burglary and one count of posses*357sion of a controlled substance on equal protection and due process grounds. He claims the sentence violates equal protection because there is no rational basis for distinguishing between those whose sentences are correct when imposed and those who are resentenced after discovery of an error in the initial sentencing. He also claims the sentence violates due process because it is arbitrary and completely unfair. We disagree with both contentions and affirm.

¶2 The State charged Bryan in…