Legal Opinion
Village of South Holland v. Chernick
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 7, 1992No. Nos. 1—89—2879, 1—89—2909, 1—90—0134 consPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon
Plaintiff, the Village of South Holland, appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of 27 complaints against defendants Truck-o-mat and Kar Kleen Car Wash charging them with violating the village’s Sunday closing ordinance by selling vehicle washes on Sunday. Defendant Truck-o-mat is a truck stop in the primary businesses of selling diesel fuel and truck washes. Defendant Kar Kleen Car Wash is a car/van wash. Both are located in the Village of South Holland.
At a hearing held on September 26, 1989, the court granted a motion by Kar Kleen to dismiss nine complaints against it, on the basis that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GarrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Carey v. ElrodIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Opyt's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. Exchange National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- New-Mark Builders, Inc. v. City of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hearne v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees of the Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Hearne v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees of the Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001