Ætna Life Insurance v. Dorman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
In this suit for the recovery of permanent total-disability benefits under a group policy, issued to an employer *394for the benefit of the plaintiff and other employees, the evidence warranted a finding that such disability existed, within the meaning of the policy. Cato v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 164 Ga. 392 (138 S. E. 787); Prudential Ins. Co. v. South, 179 Ga. 653 (177 S. E. 499).
Although the policy contains a provision that the insurance company “shall have a period of six months after receipt of [proofs of disability] to determine if such disability is permanent, and the first monthly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SouthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Merritt v. Cotton States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Continental Insurance v. WickhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Continental Life Insurance v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Travelers Insurance v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Continental Casualty Company v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- HANKINS v. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022