Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Pedigo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 18, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1189Claimant worked in the maintenance department at an apartment complex. After receiving a telephone call that his father-in-law had been injured, he left his job early without first speaking with his direct supervisor. He had previously been warned not to leave work early without consulting his manager. Claimant was subsequently terminated from his employment as a result of this incident. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct, and it adhered to this decision…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of GortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of LiposkiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In re the Claim of SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In re the Claim of SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.