Legal Opinion

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. Randall

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 16, 2009No. AC 29572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The plaintiffs, Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company (Hilb) and Hobbs Group, LLC (Hobbs), appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Uta Peters Randall, in an action for the enforcement of a nonsolicitation agreement in an employment contract. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly determined that the nonsolicitation agreement was unenforceable and meaningless. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Trial evidence adduced the following relevant facts accepted by the court as proven. Hilb, an insurance brokerage firm, and Hobbs, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bialowans v. MinorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Shawmut Bank Connecticut v. Connecticut Limousine Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. WE 470 Murdock, LLC v. Cosmos Real Estate, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. RandallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Co. v. RandallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API