Legal Opinion

Joseph J. Tallal, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 16, 1985No. 85-4085PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge.

This is a tax deficiency case. Appellant Tallal argues that the tax court erred in finding that Cumberland, the partnership in which Tallal was a limited partner, was not engaged in coal mining with the primary objective and intent of making a profit and therefore erred in upholding the Commissioner’s assessment of a deficiency in Tallal’s 1976 tax return. We affirm.

All expenses of every business transaction are not necessarily deductible under 26 U.S.C. § 162(a). Before any such deduction is allowed, it must be shown that the activity or enterprise was undertaken with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. E.A. Brannen and Frances K. Brannen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Clement L. Hirsch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Madison Gas and Electric Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. Goodwin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. James P. Thomas and Mary Lou Thomas v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  2. Kronish v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Krause v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  4. Frank C. Pasternak Judith Pasternak (92-1681/1682) Anthony J. Cutaia Diane Cutaia David G. Koehlinger (92-1681) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. Amesbury Apartments, Ltd. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API