Joseph J. Tallal, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge.
This is a tax deficiency case. Appellant Tallal argues that the tax court erred in finding that Cumberland, the partnership in which Tallal was a limited partner, was not engaged in coal mining with the primary objective and intent of making a profit and therefore erred in upholding the Commissioner’s assessment of a deficiency in Tallal’s 1976 tax return. We affirm.
All expenses of every business transaction are not necessarily deductible under 26 U.S.C. § 162(a). Before any such deduction is allowed, it must be shown that the activity or enterprise was undertaken with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- E.A. Brannen and Frances K. Brannen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Clement L. Hirsch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Madison Gas and Electric Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Goodwin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- James P. Thomas and Mary Lou Thomas v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Kronish v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
- Krause v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- Frank C. Pasternak Judith Pasternak (92-1681/1682) Anthony J. Cutaia Diane Cutaia David G. Koehlinger (92-1681) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Amesbury Apartments, Ltd. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.