Legal Opinion

In Re Habeas Corpus Application of Sweat

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1984No. 55,299PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

This is a habeas corpus proceeding in which petitioner claims that by operation of the interstate Agreement on Detainers (Agreement) (K.S.A. 22-4401 et seq.) the Sedgwick County District Court was required to dismiss the criminal charges for which he was being held for trial in that court. The material facts are essentially undisputed. They are almost wholly established by documentary evidence.

On November 9, 1982, while in custody at the Sedgwick County Jail in Wichita, petitioner applied for a writ of habeas corpus. It was immediately…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. People v. Esposito, New York County Courts1960
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. State v. DolackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. Ekis v. DarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Craig v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. State v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. BurnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. People v. FexMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API