Legal Opinion

Glasgow v. Ridgeley & Allen

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1847PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from St. Louis Circuit Court. 1. The first and second questions asked by plaintiffs in the first deposition of Willey were reading and improper. 2. That the notes given in evidence as having been secured by mortgage of Willey to Norman Cutter, were improperly admitted, not being the same described. 3. The court improperly admitted the second deposition of Willey in evidence; the same witness having been previously examined on the same matter by the same parly, in his…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from St. Louis Circuit Court. 1. The first and second questions asked by plaintiffs in the first deposition of Willey were reading and improper. 2. That the notes given in evidence as having been secured by mortgage of Willey to Norman Cutter, were improperly admitted, not being the same described. 3. The court improperly admitted the second deposition of Willey in evidence; the same witness having been previously examined on the same matter by the same parly, in his first deposition, which had been read. % 3. X Marshall, 236; 17 John., 343; 4 Mason, 312. 4. The questions in said…

1Opinion of the CourtNapton, J.

This was an action of assumpsit for goods sold and delivered, and money had and received. The plaintiffs had a verdict and judgment.

Upon the trial, it appeared that Walter Willey, on the 1st March, 1843, took possession of the Glasgow House, as tenant to the defendant, who was the proprietor of the same, and continued to occupy it until some time in August, 1844. On the 17th January, 1844, Willey executed a mortgage to the plaintiffs (Ridgeley & Allen) for the furniture of the Glasgow House, to secure them for their liability on a note executed January 18th, 1844, by Ridgeley, and endorsed by…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Williamson v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. McGarr v. National & Providence Worsted MillsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1902
  4. Patton v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Smith v. HutchingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API