Greenwood v. . Marvin
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal by. defendants, the executors of George L. Marvin, from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made October 21, 1881, which denied a motion for a new trial made under section 1001 of the Code of Civil Procedure upon exceptions after entry of an interlocutory judgment herein. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal by. defendants, the executors of George L. Marvin, from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made October 21, 1881, which denied a motion for a new trial made under section 1001 of the Code of Civil Procedure upon exceptions after entry of an interlocutory judgment herein. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. Peal estate purchased for partnership purposes, and appropriated to those purposes, and paid for by partnership funds, becomes partnership property. (Parsons on Partnership, 363, chap.…
1Opinion of the Court
Ruger, Ch. J.
This action was originally brought by Simon L. Greenwood, assignee of Le Grand Marvin, to procure a dissolution of the partnership theretofore existing between Le Grand and George L. Marvin; an adjudication as to what constituted the assets of the firm; the conversion of such assets into money; the payment of the firm obligations, and an accounting between the respective members in regard to all their partnership transactions, and a determination of their several interests in the residue of such property.
The complaint contained express allegations that certain real property,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chester v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Fairchild v. . FairchildNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Seymour v. . FellowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Smith v. . ZalinskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re PerlhefterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
- Grant v. BannisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Cooper v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- MacFarlane v. MacFarlaneNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Kyle v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.