New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. A Wirtz Transfer Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*310OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.
In view of our conclusion as to this latter contention, we deem it unnecessary to determine whether ' §2365-1, GC, applies to work done under contract with the Miami Conservancy District.
It is clear under the authorities that the contractor, Ward-Hayes Construction Company, hound itself to the Miami Conservancy District not merely to furnish the necessary labor and material, but also to pay for them. In Royal Indemnity Co. v Northern Ohio Granite & Stone Co., 100 Oh St, 373, the provision of the contract was that the contractor would “at his own risk, cost and expense do…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miami Conservancy Dist. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941