Mulligan v. Wetchler
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Motion granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the grounds that the Appellate Division order did not direct modification of the judgment appealed from in a substantial respect and that defendant is not aggrieved by the modification (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]; and see Weinberg v. Wishweg Realty Corp., 29 N Y 2d 648; Amadeus, Inc. v. State of New York, 29 N Y 2d 634; and that the dissent is not upon a stated question of law (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [i]).
2Cited by7 opinions
- Horton v. Niagara Falls Memorial CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Bonnot v. FishmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Shapiro v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- King v. BurkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Ellis v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.