Newton v. Gage
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
In Equity. On demurrer to cross-bill and motion to strike out cross-bill.
1Opinion of the Court
WEEEBORN, District Judge.
This is a bill by Thomas Henry Goodwin Newton, a subject of Great Britain, against Matthew Gage and Jane Gage, citizens of California, to foreclose a mortgage on real *599estate. By leave of the court, the Northern Counties Investment Trust, Limited, also a British subject, intervened and filed its cross-bill against the said defendants for the foreclosure of a junior mortgage, also making Walter Powell, likewise a subject of Great Britain, a defendant to the cross-bill. The original defendants, Matthew Gage and Jane Gage, have demurred to, and also interposed a motion to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co. v. Texas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. Riverland Levee Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Clegg v. EustaceIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Federal Mining & Smelting Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1909
- Powers v. EllisHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- Pantaleo v. Colt's Patent Fire Arms Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935