Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1988No. 87-1366Published

1Per curiam

We remand this case to the trial court for correction of two minor errors. First, the written judgment and sentence forms must be corrected to reflect the court’s oral pronouncement to the effect appellant’s two separate fourteen-year sentences are to run concurrently. Perez v. State, 498 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Second, because the court imposed costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard, those provisions must be stricken without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). In all other respects the judgments and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API