Legal Opinion
Teano v. Electrical Const. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 2003No. 2002 CA 2032, 2002 CA 2033PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
849 So.2d 714 (2003)
Ricardo TEANO
v.
ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION, CO.
Nos. 2002 CA 2032, 2002 CA 2033.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
May 9, 2003.
Pete Lewis, New Orleans, Counsel for Appellant Ricardo Teano.
Max Jones, Jr., John Rabalais, Covington, Counsel for Appellee Electrical Construction, Co.
Before: FOIL, McCLENDON, and KLINE,[1] JJ.
KLINE, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Office of Workers' Compensation (OWC) finding that claimant, Ricardo Teano, violated the provisions of La. R.S. 23:1208, thereby forfeiting his rights to workers' compensation benefits. We affirm.
FACTS…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Lemoine v. Hessmer Nursing HomeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. PrineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. AMS Tube Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Davis v. Farm Fresh Food SupplierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Trahan v. TrahanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sheridan v. Pride & Hope Ministry Family Support ServicesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Ashworth v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.