State v. Paul
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — Row. Hugh Babbs, Judge. (1) The information, which was accompanied by the affidavit of the prosecuting attorney, is sufficient in form and substance. Kelley’s Crim. Law, sec. 773; State v. Flora, 109 Mo. 295; State v. KarlowsM, 142 Mo. 465. (2) There is nothing before this court, except the record proper, the bill of exceptions not having been filed within the time allowed.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — Row. Hugh Babbs, Judge. (1) The information, which was accompanied by the affidavit of the prosecuting attorney, is sufficient in form and substance. Kelley’s Crim. Law, sec. 773; State v. Flora, 109 Mo. 295; State v. KarlowsM, 142 Mo. 465. (2) There is nothing before this court, except the record proper, the bill of exceptions not having been filed within the time allowed. It is hardly necessary to argue that, after the time had expired, the trial court had no authority to make any order whatever in reference to the filing of the bill of exceptions.…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
The prosecution in this cause was begun by the filing of an information by the prosecuting attorney of Lawrence county, duly verified, charging the defendant with forgery. The information contained thirteen counts, but all of these were dismissed except the third, which is in the following form:
“In .the circuit court of Lawrence county, State of Missouri.
“State of Missouri, Plaintiff, vs. G. A. Paul, Defendant.
“Harvey Davis, prosecuting attorney, in and for the county of Lawrence, in the State of Missouri, acting herein upon information and belief, informs the-court that one G. A. Paul, at…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. AppersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- State v. SchneidersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- State v. BraggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907