In re Nettles-Nickerson
Michigan Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
WEAVER J.
(concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur in the majority’s decision and reasons for removing respondent Judge Beverley Nettles-Nickerson from her current position as judge of the 30th Circuit Court.
I dissent from the majority’s decision to assess against the respondent any costs of the Judicial Tenure Commission proceeding. As I stated previously in regard to the proposed assessment of costs against a respondent judge:
*324[T]here is no constitutional authority to assess costs against a judge. Subsection 2 of Const 1963, art 6, § 30 provides that “the supreme court may…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- In the Matter of Del RioMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- In the Matter of ProbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. EubanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- In Re FerraraMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.