Legal Opinion · Dissent

Consolidated Wagon & MacHine Co. v. Kay

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1933No. 5250Published

1DissentElias Hansen, Justice

In my opinion, the judgment in this case should be reversed and a new trial granted. In remanding the cause for a new trial, the parties should be permitted, if they are so advised, to amend their pleadings. I concur in the views expressed in the prevailing opinion that this cause is one of equitable cognizance. A proceeding to foreclose a chattel mortgage is a suit in equity. Whether a decree of foreclosure of a chattel mortgage should or should not be entered depends on whether or not anything is owing upon the obligation secured by the mortgage, and in the event the mortgage is to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bean v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Garrett v. NeitzelIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Wilson v. MeyerUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Sell v. Mississippi River Logging Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Cook v. Covey-Ballard Motor Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API