Legal Opinion

Andresen v. Terex Advance Mixer, Inc

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 20, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00676Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION KATHRYN ANDRESEN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:21-CV-676 JD TEREX ADVANCE MIXER, INC, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Now before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Ozinga Bros., Inc. (“Ozinga”). (DE 5.) Ozinga argues, in part, that the Plaintiff’s sole claim against it seeking declaratory relief is not ripe. The Court agrees, finding that any adverse legal interests are not of sufficient immediacy to make the claim ripe. Accordingly, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over that claim and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Johnson v. DosseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API