Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Mulloy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Contract, on a written instrument signed by the defendant. Trial in the Superior Court, without a jury, before Bond, J., who refused to rule that the instrument was not a continuing guaranty, a,nd was exhausted and satisfied when goods had been furnished to Coffin, the person named therein, by the plaintiffs, to the amount of two hundred dollars, and they had received their pay therefor, and found for the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred dollars.

Read the full summary

Contract, on a written instrument signed by the defendant. Trial in the Superior Court, without a jury, before Bond, J., who refused to rule that the instrument was not a continuing guaranty, a,nd was exhausted and satisfied when goods had been furnished to Coffin, the person named therein, by the plaintiffs, to the amount of two hundred dollars, and they had received their pay therefor, and found for the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred dollars. The defendant alleged exceptions, which appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.

On May 24, 1897, the plaintiffs were dealers in building material, doing business under the name of the Roxbury Planing and Moulding Company. One Coffin, a contractor and builder, with whom they had had some previous dealings, applied to them for stock or material to be used in his business. They refused to deliver it to him upon credit unless he furnished them with satisfactory security. He went away and subsequently returned, on the same day, and gave them as security a paper signed by the defendant, as follows:- “ Boston, May 24, 1897. Rox. Ping. & Mldg. Co., Dear Sir: I, the undersigned,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cremer v. HigginsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1817
  2. White v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  3. Boston & Sandwich Glass Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Cutler v. BallouMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Callender, McAuslan & Troup Co. v. FlintMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Agricultural National Bank v. BrennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Pegg v. OlsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  4. L. Littlejohn & Co. v. HandyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Bradshaw v. SibertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API