Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Furnco Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 25, 1977No. Nos. 75-1723, 75-1724PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAIRCHILD, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs’ complaint, filed September 30, 1974, was dismissed on motion. Plaintiffs proposed an amended complaint and sought reconsideration. The district court dismissed the amended complaint, and plaintiffs appealed. Thus the facts, for purposes of this appeal, appear from the amended complaint (except for certain additional submissions). Although brought as a class action, it does not appear to have been ordered to be maintained as such, and thus we consider only the claims of the named plaintiffs.
I. THE CASE AGAINST FURNCO
Plaintiffs are eight black bricklayers who…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Secretary of Labor of the United States v. Phil Farino and Hoe Kow Cantonese RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Gotham Provision Company, Inc., Debtor/debtor in Possession, the First State Bank of Miami v. Gotham Provision Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- City of Evansville, Indiana v. Kentucky Liquid Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Hudson v. Teamsters Local Union No. 957District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Nehemiah v. Athletics Congress OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Tribue v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.