Legal Opinion

United States v. Robin Peavler

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 20, 2018No. 17-6542PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

*747 When people enter drug treatment, their doctors often order urinalysis exams to monitor their progress. Doctors understandably prefer to get those exam results soon after ordering the tests to tailor future treatments. The five criminal defendants in this case started a urinalysis testing company. After they received doctors' orders to run urinalysis tests and after they received the urine samples for testing, they waited between seven and ten months to test the samples-in most instances because the testing equipment was not up and running. The laboratory nonetheless…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Philecia Barnes v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Roger AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. Lesa ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Peter BolosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. Campbell v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. Jennifer Hailes v. Secretary of Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API