Legal Opinion

Hoidal v. Runchey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1929No. File No. 5883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.

In 1923 plaintiff was county treasurer of Lake county. Runchey Bros., a partnership, defendants, held a mortgage upon certain land in that county. On February 23, 1923, one of the partners went to the county treasurer’s office and offered to pay certain taxes on said land for the year 1921. In payment of such taxes a check of the partnership was given. Before the check was paid, payment thereof was stopped. Plaintiff held the check for which he had issued his receipt, and at the end of his term settled with the county for the amount of the tax represented by the check.

This action is brought…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. PlowmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Warwick v. BlissSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Scheafer v. McFarlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. E. P. Wilbur Trust Co. v. FahrendorfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Greve v. BissonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Profit Counselors, Inc. v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API