Legal Opinion

Brock v. Messina

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1941No. 2208Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearingl

2Per curiam

Plaintiff in his original application for rehearing complained of our having dismissed the suit, as non-suit, contending that we should have remanded the case for further proceedings, citing the case of Cathey v. Henriques, 160 La. 692, 107 So. 493, in which the case of Richard v. Bird, 4 La. 305, 307 is cited with approval. The case of Cathey v. Henriques, supra, is not apposite to the case at bar. We have followed the case of Miller v. Cappel, 36 La.Ann. 264, as the proper procedure and decree.

In a supplemental application and brief, plaintiff cites the case of…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. CappelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  2. Childs v. PruittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Richard v. BirdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  4. J. D. Cathey, Inc. v. HenriquesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API