Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 22, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORSEY, Justice:

In this consolidated appeal, the appellees filed a motion to affirm and this Court thereupon issued a notice to appellant to show cause why the appeals should not be dismissed because each appeal in this criminal matter is taken from an order that is interlocutory. The appellant filed a response to the notice opposing dismissal, contending that each of the appeals is taken from a “final” order of Superior Court, and the appellee, on direction of this Court, filed an answer, agreeing with appellant’s position in each case that each of the orders appealed is “final.” Appellee…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. J. I. Kislak Mortgage Corp. v. William Matthews, Builder, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. Shoemaker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. Marker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Rash v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. State v. CooleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of ButlerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Green v. Sussex CountySuperior Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. Abbott v. Delaware State Public Integrity CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018
  4. Garber v. New Castle County Department of Land UseSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
  5. Newark Property Association v. State of DelawareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API