Legal Opinion

Cessna Finance Corp. v. Warmus

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1987No. Docket 91616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. R. Carnovale, J.

Defendant Thomas A. War- mus appeals the trial judge’s entry of a deficiency judgment in favor of plaintiff Cessna Finance Corporation, the assignee of a promissory note and installment sales contract between Warmus and third-party defendant Cessna Aircraft Company.

Warmus purchased an airplane from Cessna Aircraft. Warmus executed an installment sales contract and promissory note. The sales contract named Cessna Finance as assignee. After allegedly encountering mechanical difficulties with the plane, Warmus ceased payment on the installment contract.

Assignee Cessna Finance sued Warmus,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Laminaciones De Lesaca, S.A. And Altos Hornos De Vizcaya, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Victor v. Vitols v. The Citizens Banking Company, Tucker Anthony IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Altos Hornos de Vizcaya, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API