Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1989No. 76A03-8903-CR-121PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Edward P. Miller appeals his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, a class D felony.

We affirm.

Miller argues in this appeal:(1) that the trial court committed fundamental error by admitting, over his objection, portions of a video tape which recorded his refusal to waive his Miranda rights after the rights were explained to him;

*1379(2) that the State of Indiana offered insufficient evidence of his identity as a recidivist to support the enhancement of this offense to a class D felony; and(3) that the sentence imposed by the trial court is manifestly…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Tippecanoe County Division of Family & ChildrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. McGraw-Edison Co. v. Northeastern Rural Electric Membership Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Condon v. Carl J. Reinke & Sons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API