Legal Opinion

Bischoff v. Hustisford State Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

The complaint in this action is as follows :

“The above named plaintiff, by Hoyt, Bender, McIntyre - & Hoyt, his attorneys, complains of the above named defendants and for his cause of action alleges:
“1. That at all of the times hereinafter mentioned the above named defendant Hustisford State Bank was and is a Wisconsin corporation, engaged in the general banking business in the village of Hustisford, Wisconsin, and as such had the transactions as hereinafter set forth.
“2. That, as plaintiff is informed and believes, the above named defendants, prior to the times hereinafter set forth, entered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Rowell v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. McArthur v. MoffetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McLennan v. PrenticeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Astin v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Russo v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. CMFG Life Insurance Company v. RBS Securities, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Alropa Corp. v. FlatleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Lyman Morgan and Robert Dalton, Co-Partners, D/B/A Rite-Type Company v. Inter-Continental Trading Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  5. Kuchenreuther v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API