Legal Opinion

Marlow v. Tully

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Appellant, formerly a pari-mutuel examiner in the State Department of Taxation and Finance, by this article 78 proceeding seeking reinstatement, challenges his termination as unlawful, arbitrary and capricious. Appellant was appointed May 10, 1979 and terminated October 10, 1979. Prior to his appointment, appellant completed a form indicating his willingness to accept the position on a temporary or permanent basis. Appellant insists his appointment was permanent, subject only to an eight-week…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co. v. GliedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Cady & Aetna Life & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montero v. LumNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Won's Cards, Inc. v. Samsondale/Haverstraw Equities, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State of New York Department of Civil ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Weiss v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Cacamese v. Del CastilloNew York Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API