East v. Endicott Forging & Mfg. Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
We agree with the Special Term that the complaint does not state a cause of action for reformation. (Curtis v. Albee, 167 N. Y. 360; City of New York v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 281 App. Div. 27, affd. 305 N. Y. 788.) Nor does the pleading entitle plaintiff to an accounting. (Uhlman v. New York Life Ins. Co., 109 N. Y. 421; Niehaus v. Niehaus, 141 App. Div. 251; Marvin v. Brooks, 94 N. Y. 71.)
However, paragraph twenty-four of the complaint alleges that “ the defendant arbitrarily and unreasonably failed, neglected or refused to make shipment under orders received and accepted by it from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Uhlman v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Wheeler v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Hale v. . Omaha National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.