Legal Opinion

City Of Seattle v. Janet Norman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 16, 2016No. 72667-6Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF SEATTLE, No. 72667-6-1 Respondent, C~i DIVISION ONE v. PO JANET NORMAN, UNPUBLISHED OPINION c Appellant. FILED: February 16, 2016 Becker, J. — A dog bit his owner's neighbor. The dog's owner was convicted of owning a dangerous animal in violation of the Seattle Municipal Code, a crime for which death of the animal is a mandatory sentence. The dog owner appeals. We conclude that the animal control officer's testimony constituted improper opinion evidence on whether the dog bite was unprovoked. For this reason, we reverse. FACTS…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. DemeryWashington Supreme Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API