Legal Opinion

State v. Alaniz

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 30, 1988No. 13-88-113-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

UTTER, Justice.

The State of Texas appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to quash the State’s amended information. We order the information reinstated.

In its sole point of error, the State contends that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion to quash the amended information, which it alleges conforms with recent changes to both Tex.Const. art. V, § 26 and Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 44.-01(a)(1) (Vernon Supp.1988).

Appellee’s motion to quash complained that the amended information failed to clearly state the nature and elements of the offense and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Drumm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Marrs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Sidney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Eaves, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
  2. State v. Hancox, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)1989
  3. State v. CuellarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. State v. Coleman, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API