Security Savings Bank v. Cimprich

Evans, J.- —

The promissory note in suit was signed by both defendants. Personal service was had upon the one defendant, but none such could be had upon Hartman, because of his absence from the state in California. The writ of attachment is sued against him was served by garnishment of his debtors. The garnishees make no controversy. The plaintiff sought a judgment only in rem against the attached property of the defendant Hartman. It neither took nor sought personal judgment against Hartman. Hartman entered a special appearance by his attorney, to object to the jurisdiction of the court. The…