Legal Opinion

Craddock v. Riddlesbarger

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 6, 1834PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Circuit Court for Adair County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

Riddlesbarger having obtained a judgment against Craddock, for damages for the conversion of a field of growing corn, which he (Riddlesbarger) had bought, at a sale under & fieri facias, as the property of one of the defendants in the execution, Craddock now urges a reversal of the judgment, and relies on three grounds :&emdash; *206first, that there was no judgment that authorized l;he execution ; second, that growing corn was not liable to sale in virtue of a fieri facias; third, that the circuit court erred in rejecting evidence offered by Craddock, and in instructing the jury, and in…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lindley v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Owens v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Harris v. . FrinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Forman v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
  5. Sparrow v. PondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API