Legal Opinion

Fifth Nat. Bank v. New York Elevated R. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided August 10, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the erection of the defendant’s railroad track and station-house in front of the plaintiff’s banking-house at the corner of Twenty-third street and Third avenue, in the city of New York. It has been once before tried, with a verdict for the plaintiff, which was set aside, and a new trial granted. 24 Fed. Rep. 114. It has now been heard on a motion by the defendant fox a new trial for alleged errors in law occurring on the second trial.

The first ground urged for granting the motion is that it was error to admit evidence of damage to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Fowle v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bill C. Harris Construction Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Cooper v. SillersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API