Mullally v. Dingman
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Harlan county. Tried below before Beall, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The plaintiff below, defendant in error, sued to recover for wages alleged to be due for three months’ employment by defendant, plaintiff in error, for which it is alleged in the petition he was to receive $16 per month, no part of which'had been paid except the sum of $22.59. Judgment was prayed for in the sum of $25.11 and interest. The answer alleged the contract of employment was for a period of six months at the agreed price of $15 per month; that the plaintiff had worked only two months and that $28.70 *703had been paid to him therefor; that the defendant had been damaged in the sum of $15…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Morris v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Bashus v. AbboudNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- First International Bank v. RockeyWashington Supreme Court · 1921