Legal Opinion

Holzenkamp v. Cincinnati Traction Co.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1907Published

1Opinion of the CourtHosea, J.

Motion for new trial.

This motion raises an interesting question, by no means easy of solution, namely: When and under what precise circumstance's does one who intends to take passage upon the vehicle of a common carrier become a passenger to an extent entitling him to recover for injuries received through negligence of the carrier, under the law applicable as between carrier and passenger?

In the case at bar the plaintiff, with others, had gone to a near-by street crossing, where defendant’s cars usually took up passengers, and stood near the track for the purpose of taking passage on said…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Barth v. Kansas City Elevated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. RileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Schepers v. Union Depot RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Allender v. C. R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API