Legal Opinion

Axline v. Kutner

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 7, 1993PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

This is an action by a home buyer 1 against the seller/contractor. The trial court granted a motion for partial summary judgment, certified as a final judgment under Rule 54.02 T.R.C.P. and Plaintiffs appeal.

The order granting partial summary judgment provides:

[T]he same hereby is granted and the plaintiffs’ claim in this case shall be limited to a claim under the express one (1) year builder’s warranty for those alleged defects set forth in the plaintiffs letter of March 3, 1987, and the “Field Report” dated July 20,1987, on the ground that the real estate contract in question…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Dobbs v. GuentherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. Griffin v. Wheeler-Leonard & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Tyus v. RestaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Hartley v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Burgess v. HarleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  2. Parks v. Financial Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2004
  3. Spectra Plastics, Inc. v. Nashoba BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. Indocomex Fibres PTE., Ltd. v. Cotton Co. International Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1996
  5. Amaral v. American School of CorrespondenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API