Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Diehl

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 2013PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

COLVILLE, J.:

This case is an appeal from the order denying Appellant’s petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). Appellant contends the PCRA court erred in not finding his plea/sentencing counsel ineffective and in not allowing Appellant to withdraw his guilty plea. We vacate the court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

The record reveals the following facts. Charged with multiple sex-related offenses, Appellant proceeded to a guilty plea hearing. There was no agreement to a specific sentence, though the Commonwealth agreed not to seek certain mandatory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. PersingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. OwensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Com. v. Armour, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Com. v. Drakes, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Com. v. Durney, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Hansley, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Hawkins, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API