Legal Opinion

United States v. Slocum

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 27, 1983No. Nos. 81-5382, 81-5581PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants Bert and Louise Slocum, husband and wife, were the owners of the Quality Bird Company (“Quality”), a Florida partnership in the business of importing and selling birds. Defendants Ray Slocum (the son of Bert and Louise), Francille Miller and Doris Fuller were employees of Quality at all times relevant to this case.

The defendants were charged as follows:

1. Count I — All defendants except Louise Slocum conspired to enter a United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) approved quarantine station and remove birds contained therein from…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Gasho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. SchleiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. People v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. United States v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. ChastainCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API