Legal Opinion

Halpenny v. Maldonado

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1967No. 14569PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by appellee against his co-maker on a promissory note, to recover for payments made by appellee to Groos National Bank, the payee of said note. Judgment was rendered following a jury trial, whereby appellee recovered from appellant the sum of $600.00 which the jury found was paid on the note by appellee, together with reasonable attorney’s fees of $60.00.

The principal contention asserted by appellant on this appeal is that he is not liable on the note, in that it has been fully paid and is now in the possession of the comaker. Appellant asserts that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fox v. KroegerTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. First Nat. Bank of Fort Worth v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Cook v. Service Finance CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Garza v. ResendezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. La-Rey, Inc. v. KowalskiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Shearer v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API