Josphe v. Dermatology Associates of Rochester, P.C.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.

Defendants by notice of motion seek an order pursuant to CPLR 3101 and Arons v Jutkowitz (9 NY3d 393 [2007]) compelling plaintiff’s counsel to provide appropriate medical and speaking authorizations or, in the alternative, an order of preclusion.

Plaintiff opposes defendants’ requests as overly broad, and seeks limitation to records and speaking authorizations involving “only plaintiff’s left arm and resulting psychological damages from her arm’s scarring and disfigurement.”

Discussion

Plaintiff Julia Josphe alleges that she sustained permanent…