COUNTY OF ERIE v. M/A-COM, INC.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.
(dissenting). We respectfully dissent because we cannot agree with the majority that plaintiff, County of Erie (County), has the capacity to sue and that the first amended complaint sufficiently states a fraud cause of action against Kevin J. Comerford (defendant). We would therefore modify the order by granting in its entirety defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint against him based on those grounds.
We first address the majority’s conclusion that the County has the capacity to sue defendant. “[Cjapacity concerns a litigant’s power to appear and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sanders v. WinshipNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rangolan v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- New York City Tunnel Authority v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Graziano v. County of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.