Legal Opinion

People v. Colban

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David Stadtmauer, J.

After inspecting the Grand Jury minutes in camera, the *33court finds that the People’s presentation was defective and improper, and that the integrity of the Grand Jury proceeding was thus materially impaired.

During the presentation of evidence — after testimony by the People’s two eyewitnesses and a detective — the prosecutor made the following statement: “At this time, I would like to inform the ladies and gentlemen of the grand jury that the defendant in this case does not wish to testify. However, the defense does have two witnesses * * * who would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. People v. DebrouxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baxter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. People v. DoeNew York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API