Legal Opinion

New York v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 27, 1990No. Nos. 1346, 1520, Dockets 90-6044, 90-6092PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

As the agency charged with administering the Social Security Act (the “Act”), the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) has a vital responsibility to evaluate the claims of those with debilitating heart diseases fairly and accurately. This is especially the case when afflictions disable people from working and adverse agency decisions threaten claimants and their families with indigency.

This action challenges the policies used by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary”) to parcel out disability benefits to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Martone v. ApfelDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
  2. Roat v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
  3. Abbey v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Whittaker v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
  5. Gale R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API