Legal Opinion
United States Lace Curtain Mills v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 3, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Admiralty. Suit for damage to cargo.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, District Judge.
This libel was filed by the United States Dace Curtain A rills to recover the damages sustained through certain machinery shipped on the Oceanic Steam Navigation Company’s steamship Georgic at Divcrpool on the 30th of December, 1904, being injured during the voyage. The shipment consisted of 13 pieces ami 11 cases of lace curtain machinery, 3 of which were cases 38 or 40 feet long. The action relates to one of these cases, which the libellant contends was broken on board the vessel and the contents, long bars used in curtain machines, so injured that it was necessary to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. SolanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Calderon v. Atlas Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westcott v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Squire v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Southern Express Co. v. HanawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Vacuum Oil Co. v. Rotterdamsche LloydCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- The AnnaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
- The MeraukeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
- Hohl v. LloydDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1909